Too much cgi in star wars episode 912/4/2023 Once that scene in the corridor was over, I was wondering just how far they were going to take it (you knew there was an absolute stopping point to the movie that they could not, under any circumstances, cross). My point was not that the effect looked bad - my point is what caused the effect to be "less than perfect." My initial reaction to seeing it in theaters was "That's AWESOME! I was not expecting them to bring Tarkin back into this! I know exactly how they did it, but who cares - he SHOULD be there, and, CGI or not, that's TARKIN!" The issue is that since Fisher is dead, she is not able to register consent to be digitally recreated. The issue is not that they're "resurrecting" her from the dead. We're getting to the point where it's becoming difficult, even with human representations, to determine what is real and what is not in film. ![]() By appearing in the film, in likeness or in person, the actor can be accused of approving of everything that the studio is doing. Would the studio be completely within their right to re-create his likeness in CGI? What if Hamill left the production because of ethical differences with the studio? Or to protest something that the studio was doing, with which he didn't agree? I would argue that it would be a violation of Hamill's privacy and identity for the studio to create his likeness without his permission, especially when the termination of business relationship was due to ethical or political differences. Let's also assume that there was no more footage of him, so it wouldn't be possible to shoehorn him into a part. VII that he didn't want to participate in the Star Wars films anymore. Let's just assume that Mark Hamill had decided after ep. ![]() Consider a case in which the actor is still alive, but for different reasons, does not want to reprise the role in a sequel. ![]() There are legitimate ethical concerns to re-creating a person's likeness in a film without their consent or permission. Whether you agree with these changes or not, THAT, as you put it, is a different issue. They're artistic decisions that the owner of an intellectual property is completely at liberty to make. Jarjar Binks and Greedo shooting first are not ethical questions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |